|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Correspondence: Correspondence may be addressed to Christophe Depoortère, LED–EPEH, Université Paris 8, 2 rue de la Liberté, 93526 Saint-Denis cedex.
Historians of economic thought who try to connect Ricardo's method with a philosophy generally focus on associationism and pay no attention to Dugald Stewart's influence. In point of fact, Ricardo's method can be connected with Stewart's teaching through his connection with James Mill and Francis Horner. Moreover, the difference between practical and scientific knowledge which is, according Stewart, a difference in the use of abstraction, coincides with Ricardo's distinction between questions of facts and of principles. This connection, which appears in Ricardo's work, brings into question the common view of Ricardo's method as a hypothetical one and leads to consider the role of abstraction as a crucial one.
Bagehot, W. 1855. The First Edinburgh Reviewers. In Bagehot 1965–73, 1: 309-41.
———. 1965–73. The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. 9 vols. Edited by N. St. John Stevas. London: The Economist.
Bain, A. 1882. James Mill: A Biography. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
Blaug, M. 1980. The Methodology of Economics: Or, How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bonar, J. 1923. Ricardo's Ingot Plan: A Centenary Tribute. Economic Journal 33: 281-304.
Bowley, M. 1937. Nassau Senior and Classical Economics. London: G. Allen and Unwin.
Brennan, H. G., and A. M. C. Waterman, eds. 1994. Economics and Religion: Are They Distinct? Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Butts, R. B., and J. W. Davis. 1970. The Methodological Heritage of Newton. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cannan, E., ed. 1969. The Paper Pound of 1797–1821. 2nd ed. London: F. Cass & Co.
Clive, J. 1957. Scotch Reviewers: The Edinburgh Review, 1802–1815. London: Faber and Faber.
Coats, A. W., ed. 1983. Methodological Controversy in Economics: Historical Essays in Honour of T. W. Hutchison. London: Jai Press Inc.
Collini, S., D. Winch, and J. Burrow, eds. 1983. That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corsi, P. 1987. The Heritage of Dugald Stewart: Oxford Philosophy and the Method of Political Economy, 1809–1832. Nuncius, annali di storia della scienza 2: 89-144.
———. 1988. Science and Religion: Baden Powell and the Anglican Debate, 1800–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cremaschi, S. 2004. Ricardo and the Utilitarians. European Journal of Economic Thought 11: 377-403.
Cremaschi, S., and M. Dascal. 1996. Malthus and Ricardo on Economic Methodology. HOPE 28.3: 475-511.
———. 2002. The Unitarian Connection and Ricardo's Scientific Style. HOPE 34.2: 505-8.
Deleplace, G. 1999. Histoire de la pensée économique: Du "royaume agricole" de Quesnay au "monde à la Arrow-Debreu." Paris: Dunod.
———. 2001. Does Ricardo's Theory of Money Belong to the Classical Canon? In Forget and Peart 2001, 331-45.
de Marchi, N. B. 1970. The Empirical Content and Longevity of Ricardian Economics. In Wood 1991, 1: 215-34.
———. 1983. The Case for James Mill. In Coats 1983, 155-84.
Depoortère, C. 2002a. La recension du Paper Credit par Francis Horner: Enjeux analytiques et politiques. Cahiers d'économie politique 42: 131-35.
———. 2002b. On Ricardo's Method: The Unitarian Influence Examined. HOPE 34.2: 499-503.
Fenn, R. A. 1987. James Mill's Political Thought. New York: Garland Publishing.
Fetter, F. W. 1953. The Authorship of Economic Articles in the Edinburgh Review, 1802–47. Journal of Political Economy 61: 232-59.
———. 1959. The Politics of the Bullion Report. Economica 26: 99-120.
———. 1965. Development of British Monetary Orthodoxy, 1797–1875. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fontana, B. 1985. Rethinking the Politics of Commercial Society: The Edinburgh Review, 1802–1832. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forget, E. L., and S. Peart, eds. 2001. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics: Essays in Honor of Samuel Hollander. London: Routledge.
Gallie, R. 1989. Thomas Reid and the "Way of Ideas." Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Grave, S. A. 1960. The Scottish Philosophy of Common Sense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Griffin-Collart, E. 1980. La philosophie écossaise du sens commun. Brussels: Académie Royale de Belgique.
Haakonssen, K. 1984. From Moral Philosophy to Political Economy: The Contribution of Dugald Stewart. In Hope 1984, 211-32.
———. 1996a. Dugald Stewart and the Science of a Legislator. In Haakonssen 1996c, 226-60.
———. 1996b. James Mill and Scottish Moral Philosophy. In Haakonssen 1996c, 294-309.
———. 1996c. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1996d. Thomas Reid's Moral and Political Philosophy. In Haakonssen 1996c, 182-225.
Halévy, E. 1995. La formation du radicalisme philosophique. 3 vols. Paris: Alcan.
Henderson, J. P. 1997. The Life and Economics of David Ricardo. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hilton, B. 1977. Corn, Cash, Commerce: The Economic Policies of the Tory Governments, 1815–1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hollander, J. H. 1910. David Ricardo: A Centenary Estimate. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
Hollander, S. 1979. The Economics of David Ricardo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
———. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill. 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hope, V. M., ed. 1984. Philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
[Horner, F.] 1957. The Economic Writings of Francis Horner in the Edinburgh Review, 1802–6. Edited by F. W. Fetter. New York: Kelley and Millman.
Horner, F. 1994. The Horner Papers: Selection from the Letters and Miscellaneous Writings of Francis Horner, M.P. 1795–1817. Edited by K. Bourne and W. B. Taylor. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Houghton, W. E. 1966–89. The Wellesley Index to Victorian Periodicals, 1824–1900. 5 vols. London: Routledge and P. Kegan.
Hutchison, T. W. 1952. Some Questions about Ricardo. Economica 19: 415-32.
———. 1978a. James Mill and Ricardian Economics: A Methodological Revolution? In Hutchison 1978b, 26-57.
———. 1978b. On Revolution and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1998. Ultra-Deductivism from Nassau Senior to Lionel Robbins and Daniel Hausman. Journal of Economic Methodology 5: 43-91.
[Jeffrey, F.] 1802. Advertisement. Edinburgh Review 1: prelims.
———. 1804. Stewart's Account of the Life and Writings of Thomas Reid. Edinburgh Review 3: 269-87.
———. 1810. Stewart's Philosophical Essays. Edinburgh Review 17: 167-211.
Laidler, D. 1987. Bullionist Controversy. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. 4 vols. Edited by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, 1: 289-94. London: Macmillan.
Laudan, L. L. 1970. Thomas Reid and the Newtonian Turn of British Methodological Thought. In Butts and Davis 1970, 103-31.
Lehrer, K. 1989. Thomas Reid. London: Routledge.
Levy, S. L. 1970. Nassau W. Senior, 1790–1864: Critical Essayist, Classical Economist, and Adviser of Governments. New York: A. M. Kelley.
Macintyre, G. 2003. Dugald Stewart: The Pride and Ornament of Scotland. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
Marcuzzo, M. C., and A. Rosselli. 1991. Ricardo and the Gold Standard: The Foundation of the International Monetary Order. London: Macmillan.
McCosh, J. 1875. The Scottish Philosophy, Biographical, Expository, Critical, from Hutcheson to Hamilton. London: Haldane Library.
McKerrow, R. E. 1981. Richard Whately on the Nature of Human Knowledge in Relation to Ideas of His Contemporaries. Journal of the History of Ideas 42: 439-55.
Mill, J. 1808. Smith on Money and Exchange. Edinburgh Review 13: 35-68.
———. 1966. James Mill: Selected Economic Writings. Edited by D. Winch. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
Mill, J. S. 1909. Principles of Political Economy. 7th ed. London: Longmans, Green.
O'Brien, D. P. 1975. The Classical Economists. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rashid, S. 1977. Richard Whately and Christian Political Economy at Oxford and Dublin. Journal of the History of Ideas 38: 147-55.
———. 1981. Political Economy and Geology in the Early Nineteenth Century: Similarities and Contrasts. HOPE 13.4: 726-44.
———. 1985. Dugald Stewart, "Baconian" Methodology, and Political Economy. Journal of the History of Ideas 46: 245-57.
Reid, T. 1863. The Works of Thomas Reid. 2 vols. Edited by W. Hamilton. Edinburgh: MacLachlan and Stewart.
Ricardo, D. 1951–73. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. 11 vols. Edited by P. Sraffa, with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Say, J. B. 1972. Traité d'économie politique. 8th ed. Paris: Calman-Lévi.
Schulthess, D. 1983. Philosophie et sens commun chez Thomas Reid (1710–1796). Bern: P. Lang.
Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: G. Allen & Unwin.
Senior, W. N. [1827] 1998. An Introductory Lecture on Political Economy. In vol. 1 of Senior 1998.
———. [1836] 1998. An Outline of the Science of Political Economy. In vol. 1 of Senior 1998.
———. 1998. Collected Works of Nassau William Senior. 6 vols. Edited by D. Rutherford. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Sismondi, S. J. C. L. 1827. Nouveaux principes d'économie politique ou de la richesse dans ses rapports avec la population. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Paris: Imprimerie de Fain.
Stewart, D. 1854–60. The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart. 11 vols. Edited by W. Hamilton. Edinburgh: T. Constable and Co.
Veitch, J. 1858. A Memoir of Dugald Stewart. In Stewart 1854–60, 10: xi-cxlvii.
Viner, J. 1937. Studies in the Theory of International Trade. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.
Waterman, A. M. C. 1991. Revolution, Economics, and Religion: Christian Political Economy, 1798–1833. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1994. Whately, Senior, and the Methodology of Classical Economics. In Brennan and Waterman 1994, 41-60.
Winch, D. 1983a. The Cause of Good Government: Philosophic Whigs versus Philosophic Radicals. In Collini, Winch, and Burrow 1983, 91-126.
———. 1983b. The System of the North: Dugald Stewart and His Pupils. In Collini, Winch, and Burrow 1983, 23-61.
———. 1996. Riches and Poverty: An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1750–1834. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, J. C., ed. 1991. David Ricardo: Critical Assessments. 4 vols. Reprint, London: Routledge.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
