Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


History of Political Economy 2008 40(1):73-110; DOI:10.1215/00182702-2007-047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Depoortère, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Duke University Press

On Ricardo's Method: The Scottish Connection Considered

Christophe Depoortère

Correspondence: Correspondence may be addressed to Christophe Depoortère, LED–EPEH, Université Paris 8, 2 rue de la Liberté, 93526 Saint-Denis cedex.

Historians of economic thought who try to connect Ricardo's method with a philosophy generally focus on associationism and pay no attention to Dugald Stewart's influence. In point of fact, Ricardo's method can be connected with Stewart's teaching through his connection with James Mill and Francis Horner. Moreover, the difference between practical and scientific knowledge which is, according Stewart, a difference in the use of abstraction, coincides with Ricardo's distinction between questions of facts and of principles. This connection, which appears in Ricardo's work, brings into question the common view of Ricardo's method as a hypothetical one and leads to consider the role of abstraction as a crucial one.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2008 by Duke University Press